Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act
Bill journey · stage 2 of 5
Under committee review
What it doesSummary reported to house (Jan 7, 2026)
Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act
This bill suspends the period of time allowed for claiming a federal tax refund (limitations period) during collection due process (CDP) proceedings, prohibits the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from applying tax overpayments to a tax liability that is disputed in such proceedings, and expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction.
As background, IRS collection actions and the underlying tax liability (in some circumstances) may be disputed in a CDP hearing. Collection actions are suspended during CDP proceedings, but the IRS may apply tax overpayments from other tax years to the disputed tax liability. The Tax Court may review an appeal of a CDP hearing determination. However, the Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Zuch that the Tax Court loses jurisdiction over a CDP appeal if the CDP hearing determination is revoked because tax overpayments are applied to and fully satisfy the tax liability. In such circumstances, the taxpayer may claim a refund and seek redress in federal district court. Currently, the limitations period to file a refund claim is not suspended during CDP proceedings.
The bill
- suspends the limitations period for claiming a tax refund during CDP proceedings (with exceptions),
- prohibits the IRS from applying tax overpayments to a properly disputed tax liability during CDP proceedings (unless waived or an exception applies),
- expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction in CDP cases to include jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability amount (if properly disputed), and
- provides that the Tax Court retains its jurisdiction if the IRS abandons collection actions.
What just happenedMay 20, 2026
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Who’s behind it
- Referred in SenateMay 20, 2026
- Engrossed in HouseMay 19, 2026
- Reported in HouseJan 7, 2026
- Introduced in HouseDec 9, 2025
- May 20, 2026IntroReferral
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- May 19, 2026FloorH38310
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- May 19, 2026FloorH37300
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
- May 19, 2026Floor8000
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
- May 19, 2026FloorH8D000
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6506.
- May 19, 2026FloorH30000
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3564-3567)
- May 19, 2026FloorH30300
Mr. Smith (MO) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- Jan 7, 2026CalendarsH12410
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 373.
- Jan 7, 2026CommitteeH12200
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
- Jan 7, 2026Committee5000
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
- Dec 10, 2025Committee
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
- Dec 10, 2025Committee
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Dec 9, 2025IntroReferralH11100
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Dec 9, 2025IntroReferralIntro-H
Introduced in House
- Dec 9, 2025IntroReferral1000
Introduced in House